Wednesday, 23 September 2015

DEMAND FOR VIDEO REOCORDING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.________ OF 2015
(D) No. 484549/2015


IN THE MATTER OF
A.C.Philip                                            …PETITIONER
Versus

 Union of India and Others


P R A Y E R

It is, therefore, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

a)      Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents herein to take adequate steps and measures to introduce the system of video recording the proceedings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, all the High Courts and their respective subordinate Courts and Tribunals in this country, as an authentic record of the proceedings, allow the copies of the said records to be issued to the public on demand paying of the costs, allow the court proceedings to be telecasted by the media, and also allow the same proceedings to be uploaded to the internet; and
if the said prayer is not admissible and maintainable for whatever reason as this Hon’ble Court may find proper, in the alternative without prejudice to the above, to allow the litigant public/parties to litigation to video record non-intrusively the proceedings in which they are parties at their own cost and effort and issue directions to the respondents not to interfere in any way to such non intrusive efforts, declaring that there is no illegality or misdemeanor  in such recording ;

b)      issue notice to the public at large in terms of order-I, Rule-8(ii) of the Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908, since the prayer sought for in the instant Writ Petition involve the interest of the public at large, though such a procedure is seldom observed by this court in PILs where the interest of the public at large are invariably involved ; and  

c)      pass such other order or orders, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.


                                                   

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

REASON FOR CORRUPTION

REASON FOR CORRUPTION

REASON FOR CORRUPTION


Corruption is a social evil, the offspring of mutilated mindset, founded upon selfish concepts.. 


The concept that my corruption is justified, and his corruption is malice is the foundation of it. Even a poor man/lady, being victim of corruption will advise their son to join a profession, having much possibility of earning corrupt and unethical money. They will never tell him to fight against corruption. As a society, we value the rich, and give them social status, without looking into the corrupt ways, he used to earn it. It gives a motivation to others to use the same unethical means, so that he knows that the money he earns can wipe out the stain on his reputation... 

When corrupt people contest elections, those who talk very eloquently against corruption also vote for such corrupt people, making the genuine persons out of power and authority.... 

So who is responsible? 

Its the result of our mutilated mindsets and misplaced social values.....


...Adv.A.C.Philip

Saturday, 15 August 2015

FALLACY OF LAW

FALLACY OF LAW

FALLACY OF LAW


I have no faith in the judicial system. Not because all the judges are bad. In fact, there could be many good judges. The reason is the limitations of human mind. The legal system is founded on two principles, namely: 

A) A judge will  ascertain the facts correctly.

B) Judge will exercise his discretion wisely. 

Both these are myths. There is no guarantee that even a good judge will ascertain the facts correctly unless it is as simple as arithmetic; say 2+2=4 or as simple and as undeniable as day and night. And for this no body will seek a judicial adjudication! This fallacy could be established by a simple example. Suppose,a  judge decides: 2+2=0. Then, there could be a literal earthquake. People will demand such an idiot to be removed. But if the very same judge decides: 

2+2+4+4-4-4-4+10+0+10-10-20+100+100-200+500+500+1500+1900+(100-200X5000-25000-25000)-500-1000-900+100X6000+4000-10000+1+2-1-2+5-5+100+100+400-500-100+25+(800X9000)-6746111= 0

No one will find fault with the judge though the answer ought to be 4.The people will say the judge erred,sadly though. A jurist will say a judge is free to error within his jurisdiction!


.....Adv.Mathews J.Nedumpara